W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-math@w3.org > May 2004

Re: e-notation definition missing from MathML 2nd ed schemas?

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 10:47:48 +0100
Message-Id: <200405120947.KAA13068@penguin.nag.co.uk>
To: mhucka@caltech.edu
Cc: www-math@w3.org


Mike

  Is this an error in the XML Schema, or has there been a
  change to the definition of MathML 2.0?

One of those, yes.

Thank you for reporting this.  e-notation should be added to the schema
as you suggest.

Since this isn't strictly a change to the REC document, I don't think
that it should be listed in the errata for the specification but we
should fix the schema file and document the change in the change log
that is on the top level page
http://www.w3.org/Math/XMLSchema/

Thanks again,

David



________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2004 05:49:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 20 February 2010 06:12:56 GMT