W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-math@w3.org > February 2004

Re: <mi> 1 </mi>

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 09:52:03 GMT
Message-Id: <200402020952.JAA11089@penguin.nag.co.uk>
To: mikeday@yeslogic.com
Cc: lpadovan@cs.unibo.it, www-math@w3.org

   Thanks, I never would have found that one!

I tried to highlight it as much as possible:-)
See the yellow blob in :


which is linked from chapter 6 of the spec.

  I find that an interesting justification for the lack of an assignment for
  "MATHEMATICAL ITALIC SMALL H", as wouldn't this character actually have
  different semantics to "PLANCK CONSTANT"?

The Math WG argued that the existing BMP characters should be defined to
have "specific" semantics, and the new ones should be defined to be
generic alphabetic runs. If Unicode really is a semantic character set
rather than a glyph collection this would seem reasonable. But the UTC
decided against this.

In this case (planck) they may well have agreed, but in others such as 
double struck C
they probably had (a bit) more reason to refuse to classify this as "the
complex numbers" and allow 1D39A as a generic double strck C.



This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
Received on Monday, 2 February 2004 04:53:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:27:35 UTC