W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-math@w3.org > June 2003

RE: Comments on the DTD and the spec.

From: Pepping, Simon (ELS) <S.Pepping@elsevier.nl>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 16:18:46 +0100
Message-ID: <4D56BD81F62EFD49A74B1057ECD75C06068E7A1C@elsamsvexch01.elsevier.nl>
To: "'Robert Miner'" <RobertM@dessci.com>
Cc: www-math@w3.org

Robert Miner [mailto:RobertM@dessci.com] wrote on 20 June 2003 17:07:

> Hi Simon,
> 
> > The last paragraph of section 3.3.4.1 might also have 
> specified that the
> > rowalign attribute on the mstyle element should correspond 
> to that attribute
> > of mtable, and that the columnalign and groupalign 
> attributes on mstyle
> > should correspond the those attributes of mtable, mtr and 
> mlabeledtr. At
> > least, that is how I would interpret it in the absence of such a
> > specification.
> 
> I don't understand why you suggest treating columnalign and groupalign
> differently from rowalign.  All three can be set on mtable, mtr and
> mlabeledtr.  All three have default values.  

rowalign has a different type of value for mtable than for mtr and mtd: a
list of values vs a value. columnalign and groupalign have a different type
of value for mtable and mtr than for mtd: a list of values vs. a value, and
a list of lists vs. a list, respectively.

So I thought mstyle can specify only one of those types.

I am off to the EuroTeX conference. I'll be back monday 30 June.

Regards, Simon

Simon Pepping
DTD Development and Maintenance
Elsevier
s.pepping@elsevier.com
www.elsevier.com/locate/sgml
Received on Friday, 20 June 2003 11:29:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 20 February 2010 06:12:55 GMT