W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-math@w3.org > November 2002

Re: Operator groups

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 16:35:04 GMT
Message-Id: <200211111635.QAA16598@penguin.nag.co.uk>
To: Martin.Dransfield@eslo.co.uk
CC: www-math@w3.org

> Is this an error
Yes something is in error in that the paragraph refers to blank lines
that are not there.

> (I can't see it in the errata)?
No. I believe you are the first to report this, sorry, and thanks.

If you look at the mathml 1 version

you'll see the basic effect that was intended.

The grouping is not present in the source XML file from which the
appendix is generated, so this isn't a stylesheet issue.

The grouping is also referred to in chapter 3 (as it was in mathml 1)
so I believe that the correct course of action will be to update the
dictionary in appendix F with the groups restored, but this is a
personal response,  Some other member of the Working Group (or the CVS
log:-) may have a better recollection of what was intended here, so
please don't take this as an official response (but one will be

Thanks for the report,


This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
Received on Monday, 11 November 2002 11:35:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:27:32 UTC