W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-math@w3.org > November 2002

Operator groups

From: Dransfield, Martin (ELSLON) <Martin.Dransfield@eslo.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 16:00:45 -0000
Message-ID: <54A600C436EA694581B93E4BD4D4788A0559AD21@elslonexc004.wins.epress.co.uk>
To: "'www-math@w3.org'" <www-math@w3.org>


I'm writing an XSLT stylesheet to transform equations from an older,
SGML markup into presentation MathML.

I noticed that <mrow> elements should be used to group sub-expressions
( and, specifically, that a nested <mrow> is not needed when
all the operators are from the same group in the Operator Dictionary.

So I looked at Appendix F, where it says, "The operators are divided
into groups, which are separated by blank lines in the listing below."
Unfortunately, when I look at the list of entries (F.5), I cannot see
any blank lines.

Is this an error (I can't see it in the errata)?  Or should I take it
that all operators are in the same group (in which case why make the
distinction) and ignore the recommendation to nest?

I would be very grateful if anybody can clarify this point, or refer
me to a correctly grouped operator dictionary.


Martin Dransfield
Elsevier Science
Received on Monday, 11 November 2002 11:05:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:27:32 UTC