W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-lib@w3.org > April to June 1996

ANNOUNCE: URL moved. (was Re: saving a URL/newbie rant)

From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 1996 09:39:50 -0400 (EDT)
To: Tristan RAMBO Savatier <tristan@creative.net>
Cc: www-lib@w3.org
Message-Id: <Pine.3.89.9606110916.A4518-0100000@www18>
There is now a Style directory that describes "house styles". The C++ in 
C scheme is described in Style/Cpp.html. Please see

http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/Library/User/Style/

thank you,
-eric

------------------------context follows----------------------------

On Mon, 10 Jun 1996, Tristan RAMBO Savatier wrote:

> This file (http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/Library/User/Platform/Style.html)
> does not exist (or is read protected).
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> -- Tristan Savatier (email:tristan@creative.net - http://www.bok.net/~tristan)
>    "My karma ran over my dogma" 
> 
> Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> > 
> > >       The things that baffled me the most was that the library was written
> > > is pseudo-C++.  The docs spoke of methods and objects when in all actuality
> > > there were none!  I really wished that the library WAS written in C++.
> > 
> > Due to popular demand (read outcry), I wrote a description of the C++ in
> > C encapsulation scheme used in the library. Please see
> > http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/Library/User/Platform/Style.html
> > 
> > > Why in the age of Object-Oriented revolution, when most of algorithms
> > > and design methods are developped using some kind of OO methods, would
> > > you choose a non-OO language and try your darnest to make it look like
> > > an OO one?
> > 
> > And for my 2 cents: Object-Oriented is an approach, not a language. :)
> > 
> > -eric
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> -- Tristan Savatier (email:tristan@creative.net - http://www.bok.net/~tristan)
>    "My karma ran over my dogma"
> 
Received on Tuesday, 11 June 1996 09:39:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:18:26 GMT