Re: Testing IRI fragment identifiers

On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Andre Schappo <A.Schappo@lboro.ac.uk> wrote:

>
> The difference between (2) and (3) is that:
> In (2) the slash separator between the IDN and the pathname part is U+002F
> SOLIDUS (ie the usual slash)
>
> In (3) the slash separator between the IDN and the pathname part is U+FF0F
> FULLWIDTH SOLIDUS (which is what I get when I type slash whilst in my
> chinese input method)
>
> So (2) is using the (currently) valid slash separator but (3) is not. But I
> think it essential that U+FF0F FULLWIDTH SOLIDUS is also treated as a valid
> separator (or auto converted to U+002F SOLIDUS)
>

I agree.


>
> André
>

-- 
Ori Idan