W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > July to September 2007

Re: FAQ: CSS vs. markup for bidi support

From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:35:01 +0200
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20070828202840.031306d0@esat.kuleuven.be>
To: <www-international@w3.org>

Hi Bert,

At 20:00 28/08/2007, Bert Bos wrote:

>(...)
>
>B.t.w., section 3.2 of XHTML 1.0 does define the semantics of XHTML
>documents when sent as generic XML: they essentially have no semantics.
>(Only ID attributes have some meaning, which is normal for anything
>that has a DTD.)

I don't follow your interpretation: criterion 3 says that only ID 
attributes shall be recognized *as fragment identifiers*, not that 
only ID attributes should be recognized *full stop*.
As far as I can see, section 3.2 [1] does not make a statement on the 
semantics of XHTML elements or attributes, with the exception of the 
ID attribute, attributes that are not recognized and elements that 
are not recognized.
Or am I completely misreading that section?

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#uaconf

Best regards,

Christophe


-- 
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD
Research Group on Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442
B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee
BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/ 


Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Tuesday, 28 August 2007 18:35:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 19:17:14 GMT