W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > April to June 2001

RE: XML Blueberry Requirements

From: Martin Brunecky <mbrunecky@onerealm.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:46:12 -0600
Message-ID: <235F239718A5D411B5E20090277399360A6386@onerealmserver.onerealm.com>
To: "'Misha.Wolf@reuters.com'" <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>, Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Cc: unicode@unicode.org, unicore@unicode.org, www-international@w3.org
One thing I find disturbing about the REQUIREMENTS is that it does not
address the compatibility issues.  Are the "blueberry" documents upwards
compatible with the existing, XML 1.0 compliant documents?
I assume that "blueberry" documents MAY break existing XML parsers and other

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Misha.Wolf@reuters.com [mailto:Misha.Wolf@reuters.com] 
Sent:	Thursday, June 21, 2001 8:20 AM
To:	Elliotte Rusty Harold
Cc:	unicode@unicode.org; unicore@unicode.org; www-international@w3.org
Subject:	Re: XML Blueberry Requirements

On 21/06/2001 14:37:59 Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> This is going out to three mailing lists. I'd like to add a fourth
> and suggest that future discussion take place on xml-dev, which
> probably has the broadest reach of interested parties.


The Blueberry requirements [1] are very thoughtfully written and
do *not* make any of the errors you describe.  I suggest a second

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-blueberry-req


        Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2001 11:46:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 21 September 2016 22:37:20 UTC