Hi David, David Woolley (24 oct. 2007 - 16:27) : > There is a heavily cross posted debate going to almost every w3c > list except this one, which is essentially about the future of XML > and HTML (the vendors are essentially saying that HTML must support > multi-namespaced documents but using the XML syntax is not an option). > It seems to me that this list is no longer in use by the W3C > decision makers. When the html wg has been created, there was a proposal to reuse www- html for the WG list, but would create a patent policy problem. We would have had to unsubscribe everyone on the list and ask them to join the HTML WG. * HTML WG mailing list (work public, Member and public invited experts) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/ * XHTML 2 WG mailing list (work public, Member only participation + selected invited experts) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/ * RDF in XHTML TF (work public, Member only participation + selected invited experts) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/ * old HTML list (here, public discussion about html) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/ I hope it helps. There is also Web API, XForms, etc. For what is worth this list, www-html, is read by more than one person from the HTML WG, and other groups. Discussions can perfectly happen here too. A list is what participants are making of it. "W3C Decision makers" is a strange term. It really depends on the context and the type of work which is done. There are more complexity than just a layered cake. The Web is made of many participants and decision makers. You are a decision maker too. It just depends on the context of it. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***Received on Thursday, 25 October 2007 03:06:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 07:54:37 GMT