W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Complex Table Examples

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 20:51:35 +0100
Message-ID: <46476C47.5080505@splintered.co.uk>
To: www-html@w3.org

Lachlan Hunt wrote:

>> If something is implemented and used on the Web, it should stay in the 
>> HTML spec.  Mark as deprecated if you want, but don't pretend that 
>> mistakes of the past will disappear if you remove them from the spec.
>>
>> Implementations are still going to need to implement these features.
> 
> This discussion has nothing to do with what will be specified for 
> implementations to support, this is just about what is considered 
> conforming for documents.
> 
> But, what I said still applies implementation requirements in general as 
> well.  For instance, support for IE's <t:video> or WebTV's <audioscope> 
> elements probably won't be required because there's very little evidence 
> (if any) to show that they're needed.

The difference here being that <t:video> and <audioscope> were not part 
of the original HTML 4.1 spec, so it's not a case of removing them from 
the spec in the first place (whereas that's the case with id/headers).

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
______________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
______________________________________________________________
Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team
http://streetteam.webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
Received on Sunday, 13 May 2007 19:51:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:10 GMT