W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Complex Table Examples

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 10:59:39 +0100
Message-ID: <4646E18B.7@splintered.co.uk>
To: www-html@w3.org

Lachlan Hunt wrote:

> No, that's backwards.  Nothing gets added or retained without some 
> evidence that it's needed.  Otherwise, you could use that argument to 
> get us show why the <foo> element isn't needed, instead having the ones 
> who asked for it explain why it is.

Which seems to me what's happening with refinements for <b>, <i>, <sup>, 
<sub> etc

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
______________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
______________________________________________________________
Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team
http://streetteam.webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
Received on Sunday, 13 May 2007 09:59:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:10 GMT