"Daniel Schierbeck" <daniel.schierbeck@gmail.com> wrote in message news:43DCC855.80507@gmail.com... > Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> I also don't see why would want to send it over the wire as >> application/xhtml+xml. > > Because it's not SVG/whatever. It *is* XHTML. but it is not an XHTML document. It cannot standalone as one, so it seems to make little sense to send it as the same type as a standalone XHTML document? Jim.Received on Sunday, 29 January 2006 13:57:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:59:30 GMT