W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > January 2006

Re: content type for XHTML fragments: reformulated

From: Daniel Schierbeck <daniel.schierbeck@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 15:08:38 +0100
Message-ID: <43DCCC66.8060108@gmail.com>
To: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
CC: www-html@w3.org

Jim Ley wrote:
> "Daniel Schierbeck" <daniel.schierbeck@gmail.com> wrote in message 
> news:43DCC855.80507@gmail.com...
>> Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> I also don't see why would want to send it over the wire as 
>> application/xhtml+xml.
>> Because it's not SVG/whatever. It *is* XHTML.
> but it is not an XHTML document.  It cannot standalone as one, so it seems 
> to make little sense to send it as the same type as a standalone XHTML 
> document?
> Jim. 
Good point. Then application/xml would seem reasonable. Introducing an 
application/xhtml-fragment+xml may be overkill.

Daniel schierbeck
Received on Sunday, 29 January 2006 14:08:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:05 GMT