W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > February 2006

Re: Question about XHTML 2.0 and content type

From: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 15:58:27 +0100
Message-ID: <43E4C113.2030207@students.cs.uu.nl>
Cc: www-html@w3.org

Jim Ley schreef:
>> I looked at the specification, and I couldn't find any contradiction in the 
>> guidelines for stylesheets.
>>     
>
> C. 14.  says include a PI for style elements, C1 says don't include PI's...
>   

Oh, right. I’d say that C.14 should be dropped, and replaced by a 
statement in a normative section that the user agent should recognise 
<style> and <link rel="stylesheet [alternate]"> elements and apply them 
appropriately. The only reason I can think of why the user agent would 
*not* recognise those is because it might be processed by a generic XML 
user agent with no specific support for XHTML, in which case the 
stylesheets will be worthless anyway because 99% of them assumes a 
default styling of XHTML, and class-type selectors and :link-type 
selectors won’t be matched either.

>> It seems just nit-picking for an argument not to use XHTML, imho.
>>     
>
> No, it's nitpicking about mistakes in specification writing, if we're just 
> dealing with what works, then tag soup works great.
>   

Ok.

I hope the HTML WG will address your issues on the contradictions.


~Grauw

-- 
Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.
Received on Saturday, 4 February 2006 15:00:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:05 GMT