W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > February 2006

Re: Question about XHTML 2.0 and content type

From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 13:56:03 -0000
To: www-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <ds2bqf$v4e$1@sea.gmane.org>


"Laurens Holst" <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl> wrote in message 
news:43E4AA2E.8050403@students.cs.uu.nl...
>Jim Ley wrote:
>> Only for those documents which follow the guidelines set forth in
>> appendix C may it be done, since Appendix C. is contradictory (I am
>> still awaiting responses to my issues on the contradictions) it is not
>> actually possible to follow them, and use stylesheets for example.

>I looked at the specification, and I couldn't find any contradiction in the 
>guidelines for stylesheets.

C. 14.  says include a PI for style elements, C1 says don't include PI's...

>It seems just nit-picking for an argument not to use XHTML, imho.

No, it's nitpicking about mistakes in specification writing, if we're just 
dealing with what works, then tag soup works great.

Jim.
Received on Saturday, 4 February 2006 13:56:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:05 GMT