> > Last but not least, I think there is already a sufficient and generic > > way to indicate date and time, see Dublin Core [1], although > > having the same characteristics as mentioned above (defining > > normally only one specific format for n release/update date or > > period). An user agent might parse this in a user > > demanded way, too, like expected from the (preferred?) 'attribute > > version'. Tantek Çelik: > Dublin Core date and time simply also refers to ISO8601. It does not > define any date time XML element(s). Lachlan Hunt: > Dublin core is for meta data, not xml markup, plus it seems to be based > on ISO 8601. Did I say it defines markup, or I did I say it doesn't use ISO 8601? No. -- It (DC.Date) already is a sufficient method to indicate time and periods, and having said that 'a user agent might parse this [...]' does not at all mean it's markup, since there is indeed the facility that user-agents display meta data as well. Jens. -- Jens Meiert Interface Architect http://meiert.comReceived on Thursday, 30 October 2003 11:06:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:58 GMT