Re: <link> vs. <script> for external scripts

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Robert,


Am Mittwoch, 19. November 2003 17:19 schrieb Robert Koberg:
> On Nov 19, 2003, at 7:45 AM, Christian Wolfgang Hujer wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 19. November 2003 12:47 schrieb Lachlan Hunt:
> >>   Actually, what I should have asked previously is: Is there anyway,
> >> using an XML Schema, to specify that the content model is to be
> >> inherited from its parent element?.
> >>   ie. No matter where <script> and <noscript> elements occur, we don't
> >> want elements inside <noscript> that would not normally be allowed to
> >> occur within the parent element.
> >
> > good question, great hint for enhancements of XML Schema, and, afaik,
> > not
> > possible with XML Schema :-(
> > The content model is to be specified as defined type, inheriting the
> > parent
> > element's content model is afaik impossible.
>
> I am jumping in late (just saw the thread), you can use a complexType
> to get inheritance. For example:
>
> [good XML Schema Example]
>
> Is that what you are talking about?

Oh, this may be it, I can't concentrate enough now, so I ask instead of try it 
myself:
Does it mean that if I use <body><noscript></noscript></body>, <noscript/>'s 
content model is that of <body/>, and if I use 
<body><p><noscript></noscript></p></body>, <noscript/>'s content model is 
that of <p/>?


Bye
- -- 
ITCQIS GmbH
Christian Wolfgang Hujer
Geschäftsführender Gesellschafter (Shareholding CEO)
Telefon: +49  (0)89  27 37 04 37
Telefax: +49  (0)89  27 37 04 39
E-Mail: Christian.Hujer@itcqis.com
WWW: http://www.itcqis.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/u579zu6h7O/MKZkRAvpyAKCKPAZUVkIQYak4WTWnbjIDSSpTggCfQPZW
dkZ8Y0l+wRKc/FaTiM47csg=
=Uz2t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2003 15:12:28 UTC