W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > November 2003

Re: <link> vs. <script> for external scripts

From: Toby A Inkster <tobyink@goddamn.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 07:46:46 +0000
To: Christian Wolfgang Hujer <Christian.Hujer@itcqis.com>
Cc: Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com>, W3C HTML List <www-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20031120074646.GA15132@ophelia.goddamn.co.uk>
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 05:48:57PM +0100, Christian Wolfgang Hujer wrote:
| Oh, this may be it, I can't concentrate enough now, so I ask instead of try it 
| myself:
| Does it mean that if I use <body><noscript></noscript></body>, <noscript/>'s 
| content model is that of <body/>, and if I use 
| <body><p><noscript></noscript></p></body>, <noscript/>'s content model is 
| that of <p/>?

I'm not even entirely sure that we need <noscript/>. What about:

<body onload="document.getElementById('noscript').style.display='none';">
	<p id="noscript">This paragraph acts more or less the same as a
	<code>&lt;noscript/&gt;</code> element.</p>

Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS
Contact Me - http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/?page=132

Received on Thursday, 20 November 2003 02:48:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:06:06 UTC