W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > January 2003

Re: My thoughts on XHTML 2

From: Joris Huizer <joris_huizer@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 02:05:57 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20030123100557.33445.qmail@web20206.mail.yahoo.com>
To: kelvSYC <kelvsyc@shaw.ca>, Chris Mannall <chris.mannall@hecubagames.com>
Cc: W3 HTML Mailing List <www-html@w3.org>

--- kelvSYC <kelvsyc@shaw.ca> wrote:

> Point taken about <style>.  What about <script> and
> <noscript>?  Compared to
> other tags, this seems prehistoric.  Is there any
> advantage to keeping these
> two?

Well, I must say it'd be a lot cleaner to have:
<link rel="script" src="scr.js"

Than the current:
<script type="application/x-javascript"

But removing script without another way to embed
scripts it would probably mean you'd loose a lot of
webdesigners on it.

Assuming DOM support, there is no real need for
<noscript> - and only modern, future browsers will
support XHTML 2 you may assume this


Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
Received on Thursday, 23 January 2003 05:05:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:06:02 UTC