>I strongly suggest dropping all "XHTML 2.0" efforts in favor of a new >"xHTML 5.0" language. Wait a minute. Now I'm confused. All this time I've been under the impression that XHTML 1.0 was equivalent to HTML 5.0, but had a fancy name 'cause of the XML syntactic changes. The comment above, if I understand it right, seems to imply otherwise. So, Huh? Devon _________________________________________________________________ Help STOP SPAM: Try the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmailReceived on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 00:49:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:54 GMT