W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > January 2003

Re: XHTML 1.0 = HTML 5.0? (was Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful)

From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 06:56:05 +0000 (GMT)
Message-Id: <200301150656.h0F6u5Y01883@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
To: www-html@w3.org

> impression that XHTML 1.0 was equivalent to HTML 5.0, but had a fancy name 

It would be more like 4.02, as the intention was not to make changes
other than those forced by XML.
Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 01:56:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:54 GMT