Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w3.org> writes: > At the last face-to-face meeting, the HTML WG indeed decided to throw > out "br". The WG is working hard to reflect decisions at that meeting > to the spec, and the next draft is expected by the end of this month. > Unfortunately we couldn't go through all issues raised so far, but > some of them will be addressed in the next draft. Stay tuned. Isn't it usually a good thing to leave deprecated elements in a document type definition unless doing so imposes a non-trivial burden on those who write processors for the document type? Is "br" thought to be a formatting challenge? Has the WG talked to those who have written HTML-4/XHTML-1 XSLT sheets for DocBook and TEI? -- BillReceived on Monday, 23 September 2002 15:39:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:59:17 GMT