W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > December 2002

Re: Is this legal XHTML 1.1?

From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 23:45:59 -0500
Message-Id: <p04330100ba19cfb49781@[192.168.254.4]>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: "www-html@w3.org" <www-html@w3.org>

At 3:43 AM +0000 12/9/02, Ian Hickson wrote:

>In any case, it is illegal to send XHTML 1.1 as text/html, so the whole
>excercise is pointless as no legacy browser would be able to render the
>page in the first place.


Where exactly does it say that? I didn't notice anything in the XHTML 
1.1 specs about the proper MIME media type, and this was not a listed 
change from 1.0, which does explicitly allow text/html, but I could 
easily have missed something.
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
|          XML in a  Nutshell, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly, 2002)          |
|              http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian2/              |
|  http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0596002920/cafeaulaitA/  |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/    |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
Received on Sunday, 8 December 2002 23:48:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:53 GMT