W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > August 2002

Re: Comments on "section", "LinkTypes" and "quote" in XHTML 2.0 WD

From: Chris Croome <chris@webarchitects.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 15:44:30 +0100
To: www-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <20020807144430.GB9577@webarchitects.co.uk>


On Tue 06-Aug-2002 at 12:24:35PM +0200, Christian Ottosson wrote:
> _LinkTypes_
> In the data type "LinkTypes" [3] I would like to see the widely
> discussed linktype "Parent", analogous to "Next" and "Prev",
> indicating a parent document, the parent in a hierarchy. 

I agree that "parent" would be good to have. Possibly "child" and
"sibling" would make sense as well.

"meta" is used a lot and is the recommended way of linking to RDF
metadata so perhaps that should be considered.

However people generally seem to do their own thing with the rel=""
attribute and perhaps it's best like that, one I came across recently
that I liked was rel="permalink".

More on "link" here:



Chris Croome                               <chris@webarchitects.co.uk>
web design                             http://www.webarchitects.co.uk/ 
web content management                               http://mkdoc.com/   
everything else                               http://chris.croome.net/  
Received on Wednesday, 7 August 2002 10:44:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:06:00 UTC