On Fri, 2 Aug 2002 08:52:57 -0400 "SeaHen" <chris@seahen.net> wrote: > The only real advantage frames have over tables is separate scroll > bars. But table cells could have them too! > > The codes would be: > <TD WIDTH=a HEIGHT=b HSCROLL=c VSCROLL=d> > Here, we see, at any time, an A-by-B region of the cell, minus > scrollbar width, but we scroll around a C-by-D area. Size and scrolling are presentational design, not structure, hence they should be done with CSS. <td style="width: 100px; height: 50px; overflow: scroll;"> This is valid in CSS 2. > I'd also like to > see frames become more addressable. One way to do this would be to put > the frame content in the frameset file, with this new tag: > > <SUBHTML NAME="top"><HEAD> Which rather defeats the sole technical advantage of frames (having content from multiple files in a single file) over using a CSS overflow. -- David Dorward http://david.us-lot.org/ HTML email is a bit like using coloured paper and glitter ink on a CV.Received on Friday, 2 August 2002 09:40:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:49:28 GMT