* Christian Wolfgang Hujer wrote: >1. There more cases than these two simple: >a) being sent as text/html >b) being sent as text/xml >c) being sent as text/xhtml This isn't a valid case, there is no such MIME type, behaivour thus undefined. >[...] being loaded locally [...] This is all implementation depending and can't be standardized. >Then if the software detects it is XHTML, additionally it is of interest >wether it behaves like simple "stupid" HTML software or like "intelligent" >XML software No and "detection" in a MIME envoirement must not be performed either. >3. It is legal to send xhtml as text/html to an XHTML user agent. Yes, but the HTML WG created some contradiction in terms here, since text/html must not be treated as XHTML and therefore neither the XHTML 1.0 recommendation nor any other XHTML rules apply. >What if it only contains <?xml-stylesheet?> processing instructions, but no ><link rel="stylesheet"/> elements? Section 4.2 of HTML4 applies, the user agent must not render this SGML processing instruction. Nothing else is defined. -- Björn Höhrmann { mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de } http://www.bjoernsworld.de am Badedeich 7 } Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 { http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de 25899 Dagebüll { PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 } http://www.learn.to/quote/Received on Sunday, 9 September 2001 15:58:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:59:14 GMT