W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > August 2001

RE: Positive Re. Symbolic name for every character

From: Dave J Woolley <david.woolley@bts.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 12:32:42 +0100
Message-ID: <81E4A2BC03CED111845100104B62AFB50102A8FB@stagecoach.bts.co.uk>
To: "'www-html@w3.org'" <www-html@w3.org>
> From:	Cyril [SMTP:cyril@chat.ru]
> 	<META  name = "keywords" content =
> "&Alpha-el;&pi-el;&omicron-el;&kappa-el;&alpha-el;&lambda-el;&upsilon-el;&
> pi-el;&sigma-el;&iota-el;&sigmaf-el;,
> &?-he;&?-he;&?-he;&?-he;&?-he;, apocalypse,
> &a-fr;&p-fr;&o-fr;&c-fr;&a-fr;&l-fr;&y-fr;&p-fr;&s-fr;&e-fr;,
> &O-ru;&te-ru;&ka-ru;&er-ru;&o-ru;&ve-ru;&ie-ru;&en-ru;&i-ru;&ie-ru;,
> ...">
> 	How could you do this otherwise?
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="keywords" lang="el" content="....">
<meta name="keywords" lang="fr" content=".....">

(with the content being directly in the character set, not as
entity macros.)

Note that the addition of new entity names has effectively
been ahandoned because of their proliferation; I can't see 
that decision being reversed.  I also concur with the point that
they are just macros for the &# forms and have no intrinsic
meaning to the system.  You can probably define your own with

Also, HTML has never been US-ASCII (it was devised by an Englishman
in Switzerland!).  Current HTML is Unicode.

--------------------------- DISCLAIMER ---------------------------------
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of BTS.

Received on Monday, 13 August 2001 07:33:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:05:57 UTC