W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > December 1998

RE: CSS Browsers

From: Braden N. McDaniel <braden@shadow.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 15:36:35 -0500
To: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@ix.netcom.com>, "Masayasu Ishikawa" <mimasa@w3.org>, <XavePlant@iname.com>
Cc: "html (w3)mailing list" <www-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001b01be2d21$99ca8670$01000080@bonezero>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-html-request@w3.org [mailto:www-html-request@w3.org]On Behalf
> Of Frank Boumphrey
> Sent: Saturday, December 19, 1998 8:21 AM
> To: braden@endoframe.com; Masayasu Ishikawa; XavePlant@iname.com
> Cc: html (w3)mailing list
> Subject: Re: CSS Browsers
>
>
> >That would need to be
> > <img src="foo.jpg />
>
> Duh! Thanks for correcting that over sight.!!
>
> >> >From what I can see gecko (aka netscape 5) has almost 100% CSS1
> >> compliance.
> >
> >Hm. What exactly constitutes "almost 100%"? No, please don't answer that.
> Actually thats quite easy.
>
> It passed all my CSS1 test suite EXCEPT  for negative margins. If
> a positive
> BODY margin is declared, and then, say,  a negative heading margin, the
> heading is clipped!!

In case you haven't already seen it, David Baron has recently posted results
of running NGLayout through the new version of the W3C CSS1 test suite:

	<URI:http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~dbaron/csstest/nglay.html>

Braden
Received on Monday, 21 December 1998 15:36:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:38 GMT