Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD

Masayasu Ishikawa (mimasa@vega.aichi-u.ac.jp)
Wed, 30 Apr 1997 04:07:05 +0900


Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 04:07:05 +0900
Message-Id: <199704291907.EAA22447@vega.aichi-u.ac.jp>
To: www-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 29 Apr 1997 18:45:08 +0200.
 <33662594.5C3@w3.org>
From: mimasa@vega.aichi-u.ac.jp (Masayasu Ishikawa)

Arnaud Le Hors wrote:

>NOFRAMES is meant to be used inside the BODY of a frame document, not
>inside the BODY of the framset document.

I see. Then, I think NOFRAMES element should be defined as block level
element in the "body.content" or so. In the current DTD,
NOFRAMES element is totally isolated from other elements ...

-- 
Masayasu Ishikawa