Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD

Arnaud Le Hors (lehors@w3.org)
Tue, 29 Apr 1997 21:25:17 +0200


Message-ID: <33664B1D.4B4E@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 1997 21:25:17 +0200
From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@w3.org>
To: Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@vega.aichi-u.ac.jp>
CC: www-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD

Masayasu Ishikawa wrote:
> 
> Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
> 
> >NOFRAMES is meant to be used inside the BODY of a frame document, not
> >inside the BODY of the framset document.
> 
> I see. Then, I think NOFRAMES element should be defined as block level
> element in the "body.content" or so. In the current DTD,
> NOFRAMES element is totally isolated from other elements ...

Yikes, you're right on that one. Thanks for pointing this out!
-- 
Arnaud