Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD

Masayasu Ishikawa (mimasa@vega.aichi-u.ac.jp)
Wed, 30 Apr 1997 04:06:05 +0900


Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 04:06:05 +0900
Message-Id: <199704291906.EAA22425@vega.aichi-u.ac.jp>
To: www-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 29 Apr 1997 10:30:14 -0600.
 <33662215.56E4D9D2@dlcwest.com>
From: mimasa@vega.aichi-u.ac.jp (Masayasu Ishikawa)

Doug Sheppard wrote:

>> I think NOFRAMES element should be defined as COMPULSORY element
>> for Frame document, because without NOFRAMES, Frame document becomes
>> totally useless for user agents that don't support Frame.
>
>How so?  Without *some sort of* information not in the FRAME element,
>the document becomes useless.

That's what I wanted to mention. I mean, without NOFRAMES and
*its meaningful contents*, frame document becomes totally useless
for non-frame-capable user agents. Its contents are important, not
the NOFRAMES element itself.

-- 
Masayasu Ishikawa