Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD

Doug Sheppard wrote:

>> I think NOFRAMES element should be defined as COMPULSORY element
>> for Frame document, because without NOFRAMES, Frame document becomes
>> totally useless for user agents that don't support Frame.
>
>How so?  Without *some sort of* information not in the FRAME element,
>the document becomes useless.

That's what I wanted to mention. I mean, without NOFRAMES and
*its meaningful contents*, frame document becomes totally useless
for non-frame-capable user agents. Its contents are important, not
the NOFRAMES element itself.

-- 
Masayasu Ishikawa

Received on Tuesday, 29 April 1997 15:08:44 UTC