Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD

Tomasz Pilat (poncjusz@ajax.umcs.lublin.pl)
Tue, 29 Apr 1997 17:45:44 +0200 (MET DST)


Date: Tue, 29 Apr 1997 17:45:44 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Tomasz Pilat <poncjusz@ajax.umcs.lublin.pl>
To: Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@vega.aichi-u.ac.jp>
cc: www-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD
In-Reply-To: <199704291507.AAA18957@vega.aichi-u.ac.jp>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970429173933.3788A-100000@ajax.umcs.lublin.pl>

On Wed, 30 Apr 1997, Masayasu Ishikawa wrote:

> I checked 18-Apr-97 version of Cougar DTD and [...]
> There's no space for NOFRAMES, isn't it? [...]
> [....] Frame document becomes
> totally useless for user agents that don't support Frame.
Well, NOFRAMES is for frames capable browsers (Netscape i.e.).
No-frames browser will ignore this tag (transparent tag) - they dont know
what NOFRAMES element means...

& IMHO frames are useless....

> Masayasu Ishikawa
Tomasz Pilat
PS. Sorry for my weak command of your language...
 ______                    __     __
|   __ \.-----.-----.----.|  |--.|__|       Tomasz "Poncki" Pi=B3at
|    __/|  _  |     |  __||    < |  |           poncki@irc.pl
|___|   |_____|__|__|____||__|__||__|        IRCNET IRC-OPerator
http://ajax.umcs.lublin.pl/~poncjusz/     http://lublin.irc.pl/~ircd/