Re: The Final Word On HTML (fwd)

F. E. Potts (fepotts@fepco.com)
Wed, 25 Sep 1996 23:15:37 -0600


Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 23:15:37 -0600
From: fepotts@fepco.com (F. E. Potts)
Message-Id: <96Sep25.231147mdt.18433@gw2.fepco.com>
To: www-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: The Final Word On HTML (fwd)


On or about Wed, 25 Sep 1996, Carl Morris yelped:

> > ha ha ha ha, you can't get HTML to do it, you really think adding
> > an additional layer makes things any better... either HTML is, or
> > it

And megazone replied:

> HTML IS NOT SUPPOSED TO DO IT!

> How thick is your skull?  How many times does someone need to say
> this?
>
> You *admit* to not knowing the history nor the purpose of HTML, so
> why don't you stop making moronic, misinformed comments about it.  If
> you don't know the history of HTML why do you insist on making these
> comments?

<sigh>
It has been my experience that if someone is uninterested in validating
their markup, and equally uninterested in using a dictionary to
validate their spelling, there is little point is discussing anything
relating to HTML (or anything else) with them.

It is better to just ignore their childish prattle and get on with the
main business of this list (which they don't comprehend anyway), and in
time they will hopefully lose interest and return to USENET or AOL or
whatever rock they crawled out from under.
</sigh>

-fep

--
fepotts@fepco.com
http://www.fepco.com/