Re: %flow and headers and address

Arnoud (galactus@htmlhelp.com)
Wed, 25 Sep 1996 19:16:55 +0200


From: galactus@htmlhelp.com (Arnoud "Galactus" Engelfriet)
To: www-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: %flow and headers and address
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 19:16:55 +0200
Message-ID: <HkWSy4uYOBZY089yn@htmlhelp.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article <199609241139.MAA11209@curia.ucc.ie>,
Peter Flynn <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie> wrote:
> I'm producing a composite HTMLX.DTD which will replace this and much 
> else, as I see no good reason why advanced users of HTML should be
> penalised by 3.2

Then why aren't you using the Cougar DTD instead? HTML 3.2 is
only intended as a replacement for HTML 2.0, not for 3.0.

As I said on c.i.w.a.h., can we finally stop the "3.2 is less than
3.0!" debate and start working on something useful?

Galactus

- -- 
E-mail: galactus@htmlhelp.com .................... PGP Key: 512/63B0E665
Maintainer of WDG's HTML reference: <http://www.htmlhelp.com/reference/>


-----END PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----