Re: backgrounds

Daniel W. Connolly (connolly@w3.org)
Sun, 08 Sep 1996 01:36:28 -0400


Message-Id: <199609080536.BAA02634@anansi.w3.org>
To: "David Perrell" <davidp@earthlink.net>
cc: www-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: backgrounds 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 04 Sep 1996 17:33:25 MST."
             <199609050027.RAA11527@norway.it.earthlink.net> 
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 1996 01:36:28 -0400
From: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>

In message <199609050027.RAA11527@norway.it.earthlink.net>, "David Perrell" wri
tes:
>
>Abigail wrote:
>> But isn't 'animated gif' an implementation issue, and not
>> an HTML/stylesheet issue?
>
>If it's to be implemented. Many of the responders considered it in a
>less objective light.

Note that the HTML spec never specified GIF, and that didn't stop
anybody.

Orthogonal specs are good for system evolution.

Dan