- From: Daniel W. Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Sep 1996 01:55:14 -0400
- To: Matt Heffron <heffron@falstaff.css.beckman.com>
- cc: www-html@w3.org
In message <199608302237.AA273914629@inet.dp.beckman.com>, Matt Heffron writes: >I've looked on both companies' web sites and didn't find them, so >I thought that someone on this list might have constructed one or >the other DTD. (We're going to construct our own "intersection+" >DTD defining want we want to consider as acceptable and then make >our HTML developers validate against it. Actually, the HTML 3.2 DTD is supposed to fulfill this need. Can you comment on how you found it lacking? > (Finally, mgmt. support >for requiring validation.)) Yes, we're finally winning the war. >PS. Is there a good overview of DTDs that provides a bit more info >on construction (vs. just reading). Its one thing to be able to read >one, another to be able to modify one. Well... I figure most folks learn to write by reading. So here's a whole pile of DTDs.. http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/html-pubtext/ Submissions welcome. Dan
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 1996 01:55:19 UTC