Re: <IMAGE>? <TT> == <I>? toHell(NS)

Carl Morris (msftrncs@htcnet.com)
Tue, 29 Oct 1996 16:16:39 -0600


Message-Id: <199610292223.QAA15301@inet.htcnet.com>
From: "Carl Morris" <msftrncs@htcnet.com>
To: "Peter Flynn" <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie>, "WWW HTML List" <www-html@w3.org>
Subject: Re: <IMAGE>? <TT> == <I>? toHell(NS)
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1996 16:16:39 -0600

|    This is because I think SGML is order dependant, but if its not,
please
|    tell me what says it isn't...
| 
| Alas not: the DTD says that end-tags are compulsory on I and TT, so
| you can't have the </I> implying the end of TT. You _could_ design 
it
| otherwise, I suppose...

That does not allow one tag which contains others to be closed before
the others have closed...  that is what I thought they called an
ERROR... :)  I would hope that instead of guessing, logic would be
applied, and the simplest way out would be taken, since the <TT> is
inside the <I>, and the <I> has now been closed, logic says "there is
no way to leave the <TT> open...  but this would not be the first thing
that followed logic...