- From: <Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 1996 17:14:11 +0200
- To: Chris Lilley <Chris.Lilley@sophia.inria.fr>
- cc: lee@sq.com, html-wg@w3.org, marc@ckm.ucsf.edu, pflynn@CURIA.UCC.IE, www-html@w3.org
Chris.Lilley@sophia.inria.fr said:
> Since this is to be an experimental (forward looking) rather than
> existing practice (backward looking) document, the fact that
> something is not in HTML 3.2 is not a problem.
Right you are - but since RFCs are permanent once published, I really
*hate* references that end up pointing nowhere, like current references
to HTML 3.0 do - and Cougar and the current HTML 3.2 draft are just
that, drafts.
Chris.Lilley@sophia.inria.fr said:
> All links, or just the ones for which a button is appropriate?
User's choice? This user thinks that links that the browser doesn't
know about should be displayed by default somehow, but I'm not exactly
a typical user...
have fun - it would be great to see this doc published!
Harald
Received on Thursday, 17 October 1996 13:54:15 UTC