Re: new anchor type?

The Boss (matthew@tir.com)
Thu, 27 Jun 1996 16:40:30 -0400


Message-Id: <31D2F1BE.29AC@tir.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1996 16:40:30 -0400
From: The Boss <matthew@tir.com>
To: Adrian Lozano <adrian@spray.se>
Cc: www-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: new anchor type?

Adrian Lozano wrote:
> 
> THE BOSS CREATOR OF TRUE LINK:
> > Yes I agree the explanation is better then a footnote!!
> 
> Galactus:
> > How, if the footnote can contain markup and the explanation can't?
> 
> THE BOSS CREATOR OF TRUE LINK:
> > Because if your giving an explanation you don't need a hyperlink in
> > it and if you want one you can ask to have it added it to the
> > explanation tag!!
>               ^^^
> Seems to me that the EXPLANATION >>attribute<< is just a special
> case of the proposed FN tag. Besides, having EXPLANATION be an
> attribute to A appears arbitrary. What would ferinstance
> 
>   <A EXPLANATION="foo" HREF="foo.html">bar</A>
> 
> do?

Yeah that would work great!!
-- 
THE BOSS CREATOR OF TRUE LINK
HOME WEB PAGE:  http://www.tir.com/~matthew/
E-MAIL:  matthew@tir.com
A member of the HTML Writers Guild
I'm also a member of Whos Who Online!
Want a dynamic website?
Please e-mail me or call 810-688-2016