Re: Valid Editors; Frames DTD

Solko, Dave (SOLKODE@exchange.uc.edu)
Thu, 27 Jun 1996 17:32:28 -0400


Message-Id: <c=US%a=_%p=University_of_Ci%l=EXCHANGE-960627213228Z-536@EXCHANGE.UC.EDU>
From: "Solko, Dave (SOLKODE)" <SOLKODE@exchange.uc.edu>
To: "'www-html@w3.org'" <www-html@w3.org>
Subject: RE: Valid Editors; Frames DTD
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1996 17:32:28 -0400

>
>From: 	James Aylett
>Sent: 	Thursday, June 27, 1996 12:30PM
>
>On Wed, 26 Jun 1996, Solko, Dave (SOLKODE) wrote:
>
>
>Yes - but for older browsers that might understand BODY tags with
>extensions, eg:
>
><BODY BGCOLOUR="#555555"> ... </BODY>
Yes, what I do is put the BODY element within the NOFRAMES. Since
frame-browsers are supposed to ignore everything within the NOFRAMES
element, they don't care, and non-framed browsers ignore the frames info
anyway. Perhaps I missread the initial posting on this thread, I thought
it was:
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<BODY>
<FRAMESET>
</FRAMESET>
</BODY>
</HTML>

Shouldn't that be BGCOLOR, or does NS understand non-american spellings?


	                                                            	     ,,,
---------D a v e  S o l k o-----------513.556.5264-----ooo0-(.
.)-0ooo-----
 http://www.cat.uc.edu/dave/ 	  dave.solko@uc.edu	     (_)| Designer
    http://www.cat.uc.edu/dave/Frontier/   Frontier Archive     |
Consultant
      http://www.uc.edu/www/newsrecord/index.htmlx	 	| Webmaster 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
http://ucunix.san.uc.edu/~solkode/tres_bizar/  The stranger side of the
web
---------------------------------------------------------ooo0---0ooo-----
---