Re: <resource> [was: Proposal for SIZE attribute ]

Daniel W. Connolly (connolly@beach.w3.org)
Tue, 16 Jan 1996 04:50:32 -0500


Message-Id: <m0tc82D-0002RmC@beach.w3.org>
To: Terry Allen <terry@ora.com>
Cc: preece@predator.urbana.mcd.mot.com (Scott E. Preece), www-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: <resource> [was: Proposal for SIZE attribute ] 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 11 Jan 1996 06:48:00 PST."
             <199601111448.GAA02931@rock.west.ora.com> 
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1996 04:50:32 -0500
From: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@beach.w3.org>

In message <199601111448.GAA02931@rock.west.ora.com>, Terry Allen writes:
>Not nifty if it isn't integrated with EMBED (or current alias).

It is.

>  Not
>nifty if you think that EMBED is putting the information in the wrong
>place.

I have no idea what you mean by this.

>  Not nifty if it overloads META and LINK.  

What's the problem? Why not use them in a context-dependent way?

>But then you haven't proposed it yet .

Nope.

Dan