Re: The EMBED tag by Netscape (v2.0)

Ka-Ping Yee (
Tue, 19 Sep 1995 13:52:38 -0400

Date: Tue, 19 Sep 1995 13:52:38 -0400
From: Ka-Ping Yee <>
Subject: Re: The EMBED tag by Netscape (v2.0)
In-Reply-To: <>
Message-Id: <>

On Tue, 19 Sep 1995 wrote:
> Ka-Ping Yee writes:
> > 
> > Certainly we have no reason to accept EMBED.  It is not part of the
> > standard, and never needs to be.
> Who is "we"? And why does EMBED never need to be in the spec?

I apologize for the excessively presumptive tone i used.  Rephrased, i 
believe that there is no reason to introduce another tag, EMBED, to do 
(as a special case) something that A has always been able to do (the
fact that practically no one has *yet* bothered to implement it the way 
Tim Berners-Lee originally conceived it is not relevant).
> The ability to do inclusion, via EMBED, is something that
> has been asked for repeatedly for over a year now.  

If you mean the inclusion of arbitrary media types in a document, then
<A HREF="..." REL="EMBED"> or the more specialized <FIG SRC="..."> can both 
accomplish this.  Have i misinterpreted what this desired functionality is?

Ping (Ka-Ping Yee):   2N Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo, Canada, St. Paul's College, Waterloo N2L 3G5, 519 725-8008
CWSF 89, 90, 92; LIYSF 90, 91; Shad Valley 92; DOE 93; IMO 91, 93; ACMICPC 94
Amano Ai * Tendou Akane * Skuld * Ayukawa Madoka * Belldandy * Hayakawa Moemi
<> Read the U. Waterloo IMPRINT online!