Re: The EMBED tag by Netscape (v2.0)

murray@sq.com
Tue, 19 Sep 1995 13:42:07 -0400 (EDT)


From: murray@sq.com
Message-Id: <9509191742.AA10549@sqrex.sq.com>
Subject: Re: The EMBED tag by Netscape (v2.0)
To: kryee@novice.uwaterloo.ca (Ka-Ping Yee)
Date: 	 Tue, 19 Sep 1995 13:42:07 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: bjoerns@acm.org, www-talk@w3.org, www-html@w3.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.87.9509190826.D6246-0100000@novice.uwaterloo.ca> from "Ka-Ping Yee" at Sep 19, 95 08:52:26 am

Ka-Ping Yee writes:
> 
> Certainly we have no reason to accept EMBED.  It is not part of the
> standard, and never needs to be.

Who is "we"? And why does EMBED never need to be in the spec?

The ability to do inclusion, via EMBED, is something that
has been asked for repeatedly for over a year now.  

Murray

Murray Maloney
Product Manager
SoftQuad Inc.