Re: Error in definition of head element

On 3/28/07, David Meredith <dave@titanmusic.com> wrote:

> However, I think there should be a question mark after the "(title,
> %head.misc;)" to indicate that the base element can occur on its own without
> a title element. That is, I believe the definition should be as follows:
>
> <!ELEMENT head (%head.misc;,
>      ((title, %head.misc;, (base, %head.misc;)?) |
>       (base, %head.misc;, (title, %head.misc;)?)))>
>
> Is that right?

No, a title element is required.

-- 
David Håsäther