- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 01:14:51 +0200
- To: "Steven Pemberton" <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>, w3c-html-wg@w3.org
- Cc: voyager-issues@mn.aptest.com, "www-html-editor@w3.org" <www-html-editor@w3.org>
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:37:04 +0200, Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote: > Anne, we agree with you in principle, though as you have seen not > everyone does. Well, that was more about what it would mean for it to be "a URI" I think. Whether it would mean supporting external maps or not. I think it should be a same-document reference, but the syntax should be a URI for consistency. > However, the aim of this revision is to add schema support, and not to > change the markup languages using Modularization. If we made this > change, languages that already use this modularization would become > invalid. Which is exactly what I want. XHTML 1.1 is creating bug reports in web browsers on image maps exactly because of mistakes like this. > Therefore we will postpone adopting this change until we update the > languages using modularization. I disagree with this descision. I think it's about time that this change is reverted. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2006 23:15:18 UTC