> No, I don't think that's the basic problem. The basic problem is that > <q> was designed not to degrade gracefully. Browsers that do not > recognize or do not support <q> markup now render just the context, > omitting the potentially vital information that it's a quotation. > Markup like <q><qm>"</qm>To be or not to be, that is the > question<qm>"</qm>.</q> would degrade gracefully. Here qm elements > would contain quotation marks that are to be omitted by user agents > that support the q element. (Cf. to ideas of Ruby markup.) That sounds like a great idea. Something similar could be designed for BLOCKQUOTE as well, I guess. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>Received on Monday, 23 August 2004 10:30:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:31:44 GMT