W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html-editor@w3.org > October to December 2000

Erratum in WD-xhtml-modularization-20001004 [was: Erratum in xhtml-modularization-20000105?]

From: Hugh Greene <hughg@owl.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:26:29 +0100
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.0.20001018130831.00baff08@127.0.0.1>
To: www-html-editor@w3.org
Hi there,

I sent this erratum comment a few months ago.  I notice that the problem 
does not seem to have been fixed in the latest Working Draft of the XHTML 
Modularization document.

I realise it's (presumably) a minor editorial issue but I just wanted to 
remind you, lest it slip through the cracks :-)

Thanks for your work and the generally excellent standards documents :-)
Hugh Greene

>Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2000 19:19:50 +0100
>To: www-html-editor@w3.org
>From: Hugh Greene <hughg@owl.co.uk>
>Subject: Erratum in xhtml-modularization-20000105?
>
>Hi there,
>
>I've found what I think is an erratum in the latest public XHTML 
>Modularization Working Draft, WD-xhtml-modularization-20000105.  All DTDs 
>for both REC-xhtml1-20000126 and WD-xhtml11-20000105 list "usemap" as an 
>attribute of INPUT, but it does not appear anywhere in the above 
>Modularization document.  I assume it belongs in the "Client-side Image 
>Map" as the line
>
>   input&  |  usemap (IDREF)  |  n/a
>
>(I looked at the latest draft I could find in the Members area, too -- 
>20000617 -- and this still seems to be the case.)
>
>Thanks and/or hope this helps :-)
>
>Hugh Greene
>Panasonic OWL
Received on Wednesday, 18 October 2000 08:30:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:49 GMT