- From: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 09:34:40 -0700
- To: www-forms@w3.org
Alain, Very good question. In Orbeon Forms as well, and for author convenience, we allow xforms:repeat and xforms:group around tr and td within tables, even though it is not "allowed". That could be a problem if a web browser was looking at that DOM directly, but in our case and in yours, or any situation where some sort of transformation takes place first, I do not think it is an actual problem. Wondering what other people think about this. -Erik On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 5:20 AM, COUTHURES Alain<alain.couthures@agencexml.com> wrote: > Hello, > > While testing EMC Formula XForms engine, I have discovered this in the specs > : > > Thus, one might wish to use element repeat within a table to create the rows > of a table, where each row of the table binds to a distinct member of a > repeat collection. Since html:table doesn't (and perhaps never will) allow > xforms:repeat elements as children, another syntax is needed. > > It appears that it is not a constraint for XSLTForms to use xforms:repeat > under html:table so I would like to know if it is still considered as a real > problem, if it's forbidden or not. > > Thank you for your answers. > > Best regards, > > Alain Couthures > <agencexml> > http://www.agencexml.com/xsltforms >
Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:35:45 UTC