W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > June 2007

Re: XForms and APP clients

From: Sylvain Hellegouarch <sh@defuze.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 10:41:45 +0100
Message-ID: <46692459.2080100@defuze.org>
To: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>
CC: Nikunj Mehta <nikunj.mehta@oracle.com>, Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>, www-forms@w3.org, atom-protocol Protocol <atom-protocol@imc.org>

Klotz, Leigh a écrit :
> XForms 1.1 will add the ability to both set headers and to inspect HTTP
> return codes (necessary for delete). 
> I expressed my concerns about using HTTP headers in APP a long time ago,
> but the consensus was that the value of having identical XML data was so
> great that the out-of-band channel was necessary.  It's a pity that now
> that the APP data isn't strictly identical that there's still one header
> requires, but c'est la vie, and XForms 1.1 will accommodate it.
> Leigh.

Well the Slug header is not a property of the entity sent but of a hint 
to build the URI at which th resource will be found. It seems therefore 
reasonable to make it extern to the entity sent. Besides how would you 
do with non XML data sent? The Slug header is actually mainly for media 
content such as binary data.

- Sylvain
Received on Friday, 8 June 2007 09:42:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:36:20 UTC